Start here

In one sentence: the Disclosure Diaries is a free, digestible resource for level-headed people who want to understand what's actually happening with UAP disclosure, in a structured and verifiable way, without filtering through a maelstrom of BS and personal theories.

Every week I send a short summary of what happened: what was said, who said it, and where the source is. Nothing I can't link to. This page is the on-ramp if you're new, or if you've been away for a while.

Why should I care?

Because the people in charge of this topic say, on the record, that something is being withheld. In December 2023 the original UAP Disclosure Act was stripped down by a conference committee, and its sponsors took to the Senate floor to say so (full text, video):

"The United States government has gathered a great deal of information about UAPs over many decades but has refused to share it with the American people. That is wrong and additionally breeds mistrust. We have also been notified by multiple credible sources that information on UAPs has also been withheld from Congress, which if true is a violation of laws requiring full notification to the legislative branch." – Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY)

"[...] the most significant shortcomings [...] were the rejection, first of all, of a government-wide review board composed of expert citizens, presidentially appointed and Senate confirmed, to control the process of reviewing the records [...] and a requirement as a transparency measure for the government to obtain any recovered UAP material or biological remains that may have been provided to private entities in the past and thereby hidden from Congress and the American people. We are lacking oversight opportunities, and we are not fulfilling our responsibilities." – Sen. Mike Rounds (R-SD)

Schumer, when asked why he'd introduce such startling language: "Sunlight's the greatest disinfectant. Lots of people say, 'they're disclosing it because they know something that we don't know.' Well, let [the whistleblowers] disclose it and we'll all know the truth and we'll be better off with the truth."

Three years on, that Act has passed the House in full (July 2026), the Pentagon has published hundreds of once-classified files (PURSUE), and the government's own office for the topic says it has found no evidence of recovered materials. All three things are true at once. That's why it's worth following carefully rather than loudly.

The four possible explanations

Whatever UAP turn out to be, the answer has to fall into one of four buckets, or a combination of them. Full credit to Matthew Pines for laying out this framework. Only the fourth involves a non-human intelligence. The rest are prosaic.

Systematic error. Observations are consistent mistakes by observers and sensors, from pilots to radar, producing objects that aren't there.
Systematic deception. A coordinated effort to make others believe in objects with unusual capabilities, for example to make an adversary spend resources chasing them.
Real, human, secret technology. The objects are real and ours, or someone's, withheld for strategic reasons.
Real, non-human technology. The objects are real and not made by humans. Within this bucket people usually distinguish an extraterrestrial origin, an ancient terrestrial civilisation, time travel, or something interdimensional.

The extra attention the fourth bucket gets in public discussion says nothing about its likelihood. At this point it isn't publicly known which explanation, or combination, describes the phenomenon. The useful habit is to ask of every new claim: which of these four does it help distinguish between?

Questions people ask, and the honest answers

Many of these have the same banal answer: we don't know yet. I include them anyway, because this space is full of personal theories peddled as facts, and it's worth being clear about what's actually established.

Why does this only seem to happen in the US?

It doesn't. Virtually every nation has UAP reports. The US has the most advanced and widespread sensor coverage, so it's the most likely to hold high-quality data, and the recent official developments (whistleblower testimony, legislation, the file releases) have been American. Japan, France, the UK and the EU have all taken official steps of their own since 2025; the timeline has them.

Has the government admitted anything?

The official position, restated in AARO's July 2026 annual report, is that no resolved case shows breakthrough technology and that there's no evidence any US or private entity has recovered or exploited UAP-derived materials. The same report lists cases it can't resolve, and one open Navy case involving roughly a hundred objects. Both halves matter.

What about the whistleblowers?

David Grusch testified under oath in 2023 that he was told of a crash-retrieval programme he wasn't given access to. Others have since made claims publicly. None has yet produced a document or physical evidence in public, and no official body has confirmed the programme. The Key People pages separate what each person has said on the record from what's been attributed to them by others.

Why would non-human craft keep crashing? What do they want? How long has this been going on? What do they look like?

There's no public consensus on any of these and no verifiable evidence has been put forward for any one theory. These questions also smuggle in assumptions (that such craft exist, that they'd be immune to failure). Let's first establish whether anything is crashing at all.

What's a UAP, a legacy programme, a review board?

The definitions page covers the jargon, mostly in the language of the legislation itself.

Where to go next

Timeline: every notable development since 2017, by month, with sources.
Key People: who's who, and what each has said on the record.
Definitions: the terms, mostly from the legislation.
Documents: the primary documents, hosted as PDFs.
PURSUE tracker: every Pentagon file release, what was in it, and the caveats.
Legislation tracker: every bill and amendment, and what happened to it.

If you'd rather have the weekly in your inbox, it's free and always will be: subscribe here. If you think I've got something wrong or missed something, reach out.